Thursday, April 25, 2013

Avoiding Mixing Issues with Paraquat! (Culpepper, York, Mclean, Faircloth)

UGA AGENTS:  Below is a newsletter that will also go out on our cotton blog shortly.  It addresses tank-mix compatibility issues with paraquat when used at burndown or right after planting in cotton.  In the pest control hand book, we recommend Crop Oil as the adjuvant of choice with these mixtures and at the time we published the book data suggested Crop Oil was the best adjuvant; however, recent research has suggested a surfactant is a better choice to reduce compatibility concerns.  Keep in mind for weed control a Crop Oil is the better choice but again for compatibility the data suggest surfactants may be less problematic.

The smart guy is going to do a jar test and find a Crop Oil that is compatible with the products he/she wants to use based on their water source!!  Also, we (UGA and Syngenta) will provide kits to address this next year and the process will be much easier with these kits as compared to information provided below.   If you (only you guys) want a kit for this year call Wilson Faircloth (Syngenta) at 229-854-0278 and he will send you one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During 2012, numerous tank compatibility issues occurred when mixing paraquat (Gramoxone SL 2.0 and others) with commonly used burndown or preemergence herbicides for cotton (Figure 1).  Efforts over the winter have shown that each major supplier of adjuvants (non-ionic surfactants, AMS, crop oils, etc.) has products that are effective in avoiding compatibility issues (Figure 2).  Two themes are clear from these tests: 1) use higher GPA’s such as 15 when possible, and 2) slow down and remember proper pesticide mixing procedures; such as adding half the water to the tank before adding ANY pesticide or adjuvant to the spray tank.  Due to the numerous adjuvants available, different water sources, and spray volumes, the best approach is for each grower to conduct compatibility tests prior to mixing herbicides in their spray tank.   

Methods to conduct compatibility tests when applying paraquat mixtures at 15 GPA:

1.  Place 1 quart of water in an approved clear container for pesticides.

2.  Add adjuvants: 4.7 mls or 1 teaspoon equals 0.5% v/v as recommended. Invert
10 times and evaluate.  Invert EACH time you add an adjuvant or pesticide to the container.

3.  Add 7.9 mls of Reflex, or 1.5 teaspoons (this equals 1 pt/A).

4.  Now each grower would have to decide which Reflex tank mix partner will be used such as Warrant, Direx, or Prowl.  For Warrant add 24 mls or 5 teaspoons (equal to 3 pt/A), Direx add 12 ml or 2.5 teaspoons (equal to 1.5 pt/A) or Prowl add 16 mls or 3 teaspoons (equal to 1 qt/A).

5.  Add 16 mls or 3 teaspoons of paraquat (this equals 1 qt/A).

6.  After placing products in container, place lid on container and tighten.  Invert at least 10 times and evaluate.

7.  If incompatibility is apparent, repeat the test with the addition of a compatibility agent at the
appropriate rate BEFORE adding a non-ionic surfactant.  AMS-containing adjuvants have been
effective in some cases.

8.  After compatibility testing is complete, dispose of any pesticides and containers in accordance with the
Storage and Disposal section of the labels for the herbicides used.
 

Spray Tank Mixing Order When Applying Paraquat:

1 .  Fill spray tank ½ full with clean water.

2.  Begin tank agitation and continue agitation until the tank is empty after application.

3.  High quality adjuvant(s). 

4.  Dry Formulations (WP, DF, etc.)

5.  Liquid Formulations (SC, EC, L, etc.)

6.  Paraquat

7.  Fill remainder of spray tank
 

Additional Thoughts:

1.  Using at least 15 GPA carrier volume will lesson compatibility issues; thus, the example above used 15 GPA, but if applying other volumes make appropriate changes above.

2.  Each water source should be tested as it can greatly impact compatibility.

3.  Test each adjuvant; test 2012 product and 2013 product even if it is the same name brand.

4.  Warm water will lessen compatibility issues.

5.  If compatibility problems do occur in the tank, a commercial degreaser has been shown to be an
effective cleaning agent.  Avoid exposure to pesticides while cleaning tanks.

6.  The example above uses general herbicide rates; adjust rates according to those being applied.

7.  Pesticide mixing containers can be purchased:
http://www.co2sprayers.com/results.cfm?Category=56&subcat=ALL

8.  Syringes, marked in ml, can be purchased at: http://www.fishersci.com   (just search syringes).

9.  Joint efforts are underway between Syngenta and UGA to develop and distribute an inexpensive test kit that is simple to use for 2014. 

Figure 1. Fomesafen + paraquat with an incompatible non-ionic surfactant. 

Figure 2.  Fomesafen + paraquat with a compatible non-ionic surfactant.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Glyphosate Formulations Loaded or Unloaded? (Prostko)


Should crop oil be added to Glyphosate + Atrazine tank-mixes in field corn?  This is one of the most common questions that I receive at this time of year.  Generally, my response is that if you are using a “loaded” formulation (i.e. already has adjuvants included) then there is no need for an additional adjuvant.  Which formulations of glyphosate are loaded or unloaded?  Rather than reinvent the wheel, check out the links below for additional information about the various formulations of glyphosate: 






 

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Steadfast Q and Certain Dekalb Corn Hybrids (Prostko)


Recently, it has come to my attention that a few field corn hybrids being sold in our state (DKC 64-69, DKC 62-08, and DKC 62-09) may be sensitive to certain sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides.  As you may recall, there has always been a precaution when using SU herbicides on field corn since some hybrids can be more sensitive than others.  This herbicide by hybrid interaction has been studied since the early development days (i.e. late 1980’s) of Accent (nicosulfuron) and Beacon (primisulfuron). 

A few years ago, DuPont released their Q line of SU herbicides which contain the crop safener, isoxadifen.  Isoxadifen increases the tolerance of field corn to the SU herbicides by triggering rapid herbicide metabolism.  One of the most popular field corn herbicides used in Georgia is Steadfast Q (nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + isoxadifen).  Since Dekalb currently rates the above mentioned hybrids as being sensitive to the SU herbicides, there has been some concern about using Steadfast Q on these hybrids.  From what I have heard, the sensitivity of these corn hybrids was tested using the unsafened formulation of Steadfast (- isoxadifen) not Steadfast Q (+ isoxadifen). 

Quoting directly from an official DuPont publication, “DuPont recommends and stands behind labeled use of our products on all field-corn hybrids.”   Since DuPont has put in writing that they will support/backup the use of Steadfast Q on these hybrids, growers, dealers, and consultants should have fewer reservations about using the product.  Keep in mind that I have no UGA data to support DuPont’s claims but will be evaluating a 1X and 2X rate of Steadfast Q on DKC 64-69 this year. 

At this point, I am not aware of other field corn hybrids being planted that could be sensitive to the SU herbicides.  Pioneer corn hybrid herbicide sensitivity information is available in the following publication: https://www.pioneer.com/CMRoot/Pioneer/US/products/stewardship/2013_corn_herbicide_guide_ProdList.pdf

Since I could not quickly find a valid web-address for their publication, a copy of DeKalb’s 2013 field corn hybrid herbicide sensitivity guide has been provided in a separate e-mail or is available upon request.

 

Friday, April 12, 2013

Glyphosate Use in RR Field Corn (Prostko)

There were 2 trait events, discovered by Monsanto, that lead to the development of RR corn hybrids.  GA21 was the first event used to develop the original RR corn hybrids.  These hybrids were commercialized in 1998.  A later trait event, NK603, resulted in increased tolerance to glyphosate and the subsequent commercial release of RR2 corn hybrids in 2001. 

It has recently come to my attention that not all field corn hybrids planted in Georgia are RR2 corn hybrids.  There are some corn hybrids that contain the original RR event, including Pioneer’s new racehorse, 2023BVT.  This is very important for those of us who make public recommendations since certain formulations of glyphosate are not currently labeled for use on RR corn hybrids.   Corn growers should check with their seed salesman to determine if their planted hybrids are RR or RR2 before making a POST application of glyphosate.
Syngenta corn hybrids (Northrup King) that have the glyphosate-tolerance trait are being sold as Agrisure® GT hybrids.  The event used in these hybrids was GA21, thus they could be considered RR hybrids.  Pioneer 2023BVT has the Agrisure® GT trait. 
The following is a summary of various glyphosate products that can be used on glyphosate-tolerant corn hybrids:
Glyphosate Formulation
 
Manufacturer
Product  Rate/A (ozs)
RR Corn Hybrids
RR2 Corn Hybrids
0.75 lb ae
1.12 lb ae
Buccaneer Plus
Tenkoz
32
48
Yes
Yes
Credit 41 Extra
NuFarm
32
48
Yes
Yes (?)*
Gly Star Plus
Albaugh
32
48
Yes
Yes
Gly-4 Plus
UCPA
32
48
Yes
Yes (?)*
Glyfos X-tra
Cheminova
32
48
Yes
Yes
Honcho Plus
Monsanto
32
48
No
Yes
Roundup PowerMax
Monsanto
22
32
No
Yes
Roundup WeatherMax
Monsanto
22
32
No
Yes
Touchdown HiTech
Syngenta
19
29
Yes
Yes
Touchdown Total
Syngenta
23
34
Yes
Yes
*These generic labels make no specific distinction between RR and RR2 hybrids. 

The next issue of concern is what application rate of glyphosate can legally be used on RR and RR2 corn hybrids?  Generally, RR corn hybrids can receive 2 in-crop applications of glyphosate at 0.75 lb ae/A from emergence through the V8 stage or 30” in height (whichever occurs first).  RR2 corn hybrids can receive 2 in-crop applications of 1.12 lb ae/A from emergence through V8 or 30”.  Glyphosate can also be applied on RR2 corn hybrids when the corn is 30-48” tall with drop nozzles.
There is one exception to these rules.  The labels of Syngenta’s Touchdown products make no rate/timing distinctions between RR and RR2 corn hybrids.
If this makes absolutely no sense at all to you, join the club.  I have spent numerous hours over the last week trying to determine what is legal or not.  Also, it is very likely that Monsanto will amend their glyphosate labels in the very near future to include RR corn hybrids.
Bottom line, growers need to know if their corn hybrids are RR or RR2 and they must READ their specific glyphosate label to determine if, when, and how much can be applied.

 

  




 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Zidua Labeled for Use in Soybean (Prostko)

Zidua 85WG (pyroxasulfone) recently received a registration for use in soybean.  You may recall that back on January 10, I published some information on this blog about its potential uses in field corn.  Zidua provides residual control of certain annual grass and broadleaf weeds, including Palmer amaranth (Figure 1).  Zidua can be applied PPI, PRE, or EPOST at rates ranging between 1.0 to 2.1 oz/A on coarse soil types (~$6.50/A to $13.65/A).  Zidua should NOT be applied from soybean emergence (cracking) through the unifoliolate stage of growth or unacceptable crop injury may occur. A copy of the complete supplemental soybean label can be found at the following location: http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ldAMK004.pdf

Additionally, there have been revisions to the crop rotation restrictions for Zidua.  Current crop rotation restrictions for Zidua can be viewed at the following location:
http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ldAMK003.pdf


Figure 1.  Weed Control in Soybean with Zidua 85WG @ 2 oz/A.