Friday, April 12, 2013

Glyphosate Use in RR Field Corn (Prostko)

There were 2 trait events, discovered by Monsanto, that lead to the development of RR corn hybrids.  GA21 was the first event used to develop the original RR corn hybrids.  These hybrids were commercialized in 1998.  A later trait event, NK603, resulted in increased tolerance to glyphosate and the subsequent commercial release of RR2 corn hybrids in 2001. 

It has recently come to my attention that not all field corn hybrids planted in Georgia are RR2 corn hybrids.  There are some corn hybrids that contain the original RR event, including Pioneer’s new racehorse, 2023BVT.  This is very important for those of us who make public recommendations since certain formulations of glyphosate are not currently labeled for use on RR corn hybrids.   Corn growers should check with their seed salesman to determine if their planted hybrids are RR or RR2 before making a POST application of glyphosate.
Syngenta corn hybrids (Northrup King) that have the glyphosate-tolerance trait are being sold as Agrisure® GT hybrids.  The event used in these hybrids was GA21, thus they could be considered RR hybrids.  Pioneer 2023BVT has the Agrisure® GT trait. 
The following is a summary of various glyphosate products that can be used on glyphosate-tolerant corn hybrids:
Glyphosate Formulation
 
Manufacturer
Product  Rate/A (ozs)
RR Corn Hybrids
RR2 Corn Hybrids
0.75 lb ae
1.12 lb ae
Buccaneer Plus
Tenkoz
32
48
Yes
Yes
Credit 41 Extra
NuFarm
32
48
Yes
Yes (?)*
Gly Star Plus
Albaugh
32
48
Yes
Yes
Gly-4 Plus
UCPA
32
48
Yes
Yes (?)*
Glyfos X-tra
Cheminova
32
48
Yes
Yes
Honcho Plus
Monsanto
32
48
No
Yes
Roundup PowerMax
Monsanto
22
32
No
Yes
Roundup WeatherMax
Monsanto
22
32
No
Yes
Touchdown HiTech
Syngenta
19
29
Yes
Yes
Touchdown Total
Syngenta
23
34
Yes
Yes
*These generic labels make no specific distinction between RR and RR2 hybrids. 

The next issue of concern is what application rate of glyphosate can legally be used on RR and RR2 corn hybrids?  Generally, RR corn hybrids can receive 2 in-crop applications of glyphosate at 0.75 lb ae/A from emergence through the V8 stage or 30” in height (whichever occurs first).  RR2 corn hybrids can receive 2 in-crop applications of 1.12 lb ae/A from emergence through V8 or 30”.  Glyphosate can also be applied on RR2 corn hybrids when the corn is 30-48” tall with drop nozzles.
There is one exception to these rules.  The labels of Syngenta’s Touchdown products make no rate/timing distinctions between RR and RR2 corn hybrids.
If this makes absolutely no sense at all to you, join the club.  I have spent numerous hours over the last week trying to determine what is legal or not.  Also, it is very likely that Monsanto will amend their glyphosate labels in the very near future to include RR corn hybrids.
Bottom line, growers need to know if their corn hybrids are RR or RR2 and they must READ their specific glyphosate label to determine if, when, and how much can be applied.

 

  




 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Zidua Labeled for Use in Soybean (Prostko)

Zidua 85WG (pyroxasulfone) recently received a registration for use in soybean.  You may recall that back on January 10, I published some information on this blog about its potential uses in field corn.  Zidua provides residual control of certain annual grass and broadleaf weeds, including Palmer amaranth (Figure 1).  Zidua can be applied PPI, PRE, or EPOST at rates ranging between 1.0 to 2.1 oz/A on coarse soil types (~$6.50/A to $13.65/A).  Zidua should NOT be applied from soybean emergence (cracking) through the unifoliolate stage of growth or unacceptable crop injury may occur. A copy of the complete supplemental soybean label can be found at the following location: http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ldAMK004.pdf

Additionally, there have been revisions to the crop rotation restrictions for Zidua.  Current crop rotation restrictions for Zidua can be viewed at the following location:
http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ldAMK003.pdf


Figure 1.  Weed Control in Soybean with Zidua 85WG @ 2 oz/A.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Fierce Labeled for Use in Soybean (Prostko)

Fierce 76WG recently received a label for preemergence (PRE) use in soybean.  Fierce 76WG is a combination of 33.5% Valor (flumioxazin) + 42.5% Zidua (pyroxasulfone).  The normal use rate of Fierce for coarse soil types is 3 oz/A.  Fierce 76WG @ 3 oz/A is equivalent to Valor 51WG @ 2 oz/A + Zidua 85WG @ 1.5 oz/A.  Generally, Fierce has looked impressive in my field trials (Figure 1).  A copy of the supplemental Fierce soybean label can be found at the following location:
http://www.valent.com/Data/Labels/2013-FIE-0013%20Fierce%20Soybean.pdf

Figure 1.  Fierce for Weed Control in Soybean - 2012

Currently, there are several PRE soybean herbicides that contain the active ingredient flumioxazin (Envive, Fierce, Valor, Valor XLT).  There is no question that one of the most effective herbicide programs for the control of Palmer amaranth in soybean would be to use one of these flumioxazin-containing products (PRE) then follow with Reflex (POST).  However, this progam should not be encouraged since all of these herbicides have the same mode of action (PPO-inhibitor).  Growers in a soybean/corn rotation might get away with this program since Reflex and Valor are not being overused.  But, growers in a cotton/peanut rotation, who are relying heavily on Valor and Reflex, should avoid their overuse in soybean.  Some specific recommendation's for soybean growers who want to protect Valor and Reflex are presented in Figure 2. 


Figure 2.  Soybean Herbicide Options That Help Protect Valor and Reflex



Friday, March 1, 2013

Counter/Herbicide Interactions in Field Corn (Prostko)


It is very important to remember that if a field corn grower wants/needs to use an in-furrow application of Counter 20G, he cannot use certain herbicides (Figure 1).  This negative insecticide/herbicide interaction is more commonly associated with the ALS-inhibiting herbicides (Accent, Beacon, Steadfast Q) but can also occur with certain HPPD-inhibitors (Callisto, Halex GT) and PPO-inhibitors (Sharpen, Verdict).  In one of my field corn trials conducted in 2012, a Counter/Steadfast interaction resulted in a 40% yield loss.  The manufacturers of Counter 20G (AMVAC) have put together a excellent publication to address this issue (Figure 2).  

Figure 1.  Field Corn Injury Caused By Counter/ALS Herbicide Interaction.
 

Figure 2.  AMVAC Counter/Herbicide Publication

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Postemergence Field Corn Herbicides (Prostko)

Not sure what happened, but the table below was accidently left out of the 2013 UGA Pest Control Handbook.  It should help you address questions about times of application in field corn.
 
Table 1.  Times of Application/PHI for Postemergence Herbicide Labeled for Use in Field.
 
 
Herbicide
Field Corn Stage of Growth
PHI
(DAYS)
Grazing, Feed, Forage, Hay, Silage Interval (days)
Earliest
Latest
Accent Q
1-2 leaf
20” or V6
20-36” or V10 - drops
 
30
Aim
spike
V8
V8-14 leaf collars - drops
14 leaf collars
14
Atrazine
PPI/PRE
12”
 
grazing = 21
forage = 60
Basagran
1-2 leaf
NL
 
12
Callisto
pre
30” tall or 8 leaf stage
45
45
Capreno
V1
V6
V6-V7- drops
 
45
Clarity
1-2 leaf
5th leaf or 8” tall
8-36” tall drops
 
 
Dual Magnum
PPI/PRE
40” tall
 
30
ET
Spike
V4
V4-V8 - drops
90
50
Halex GT
Spike
30” or V8
45
45
Impact/Armezon
spike
??
45
45
Laudis
1-2 leaf
V8
 
45
Liberty
spike
24” or V7
24-36” - drops
70
60
Prowl H20
spike
30” or V8
 
21
Realm Q
1-2 leaf
20” or V7
70
45
Resolve Q
1-2 leaf
20” or V7
 
30
Roundup
spike
30” or V8
30-48” - drops
50
50
Sandea/Permit
spike
layby
 
30
Status
V2
5th leaf or 8”
8-36” or V10 - drops
72
32
Steadfast Q
1-2 leaf
20” or V6
 
30
Warrant
spike
24”
24-30” - drops
 
40
Zidua
spike
V4
 
 
1NL = none specifically listed on the label. 

 

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Valor Application Method (Prostko)

Not sure what's going on in some counties so here is a friendly reminder that UGA does not recommend that Valor be applied preplant incorporated (PPI) in peanut for 2 very good reasons: 1) Valor is not labeled for this type of application and 2) PPI applications provide significantly less control of of Palmer amaranth than PRE applications (Figure 1).

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Gramoxone/Reflex Tank-Mixtures (Prostko)

Over the last few years, growers have experienced a few problems when tank-mixing Gramoxone (paraquat) + Reflex (fomesafen).  In order to prevent these potential compatibility problems, consider the following recommendations developed by Syngenta:

1) When tank-mixing Gramoxone and Reflex, use a non-ionic surfactant (NIS) that contains a minimum of 80% active ingredient.

2) With spray volumes of 10 GPA or more, use NIS at 2 qt/100 gal (0.5% v/v).  Use 1 gal/100 gal (1% v/v) when spraying less than 10 GPA.

3) Mix chemicals in the following order:

a) Add half of the required amount of clean water to the spray tank.

b) Start the sprayer agitation system and continue agitation throughout mixing and spraying.

c) Add the required amount of non-ionic surfactant to the spray tank.

d) Add the required amount of Reflex to the spray tank.

e) Add the required amount of Gramoxone brands to the spray tank.

f) Add the remaining amount of clean water to the spray tank.